Friday, August 14, 2009

Violent video games are not to blame

Addiction and violence to online gaming isnt a new issue that has risen among us anymore. It has been talked about, discussed and debated. i disagree that violent video games is the sole reason that brings about violence in most children and teenagers. According to clinical psychologist Dr Alvin Ng, he said "While there is evidence showing that violent games can breed violence in children, it is insufficiently significant to say that these video games actually cause violence. Studies on media violence have shown it has no significant effect on juvenile crime either," He also added that the effects of the violence from video games are only short-term and do not mean that the children will actually grow up to be violent adults. He also mentioned that "Many studies in this area are correlational studies which show conflicting results on the relationship between violent video games and teen violence. Moreover, correlation does not mean causation." From what he said, it is clear that we cant solely blame violent games as the reason to a child's violent behaviour.

Taken from the same web article, we have a game designer's viewpoint about violent video games. They are afterall teh ones of created the videogame and decide how the video game should be like, violent or non-violent. A game designer based in the United States, who declined to be identified, told theSun: "I don't really think there's a trend to make games more violent - it's the depiction which has changed in the last few years. The single biggest factor driving new games sales and new hardware sales are the visuals. "

He added that "It's up to the developer to choose what is appropriate content for a particular title. "

"It's up to the ratings board (in the US, the ESRB rates all PC and console games) to determine an age appropriate to a game. "

"It's up to the retail store to determine whether or not a customer should be purchasing a 'Mature' rated title (17 years and older in the US). "

"And finally, it's up to the parents to monitor what their child is playing, and whether the content of the game is right for their family's values."

What we can do is that parents should be held responsible to control their childrens' exposure and limits on what they consider as unhealthy content and that of course includes the violent video games. Children are capable of learning self control and boundaries if they are taught of it at a young age. Instead of trying to shiled their children from violence, parents should show it as an example to emphasise on positive values like respect and empathy. It is impossible to avoid children from violence altogether, so why not turn it around and use it as a teaching tool?

As a conclusion, we cant blame that violent video games cause our children to grow up to be violent executers. What about horror movies and blockbusting television series that are comparibly more violent than video games? What about the environment of where the child is raised? there are an abundant of other factors that can lead to violence in children.


Reference: http://www.sun2surf.com/articlePrint.cfm?id=11883



4 comments:

  1. Yes, parents should be held responsible for their children's exposure to violence and we cannot blame the violent video games entirely. Teaching children good attitudes and manners from a very young age could help them to value what’s right or wrong themselves. This could somewhat defend the children against doing violence. Do butt in and say hello if you think your children are starting to be violent.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do totally agree with Charlotte and Syah. When you can't control how the world works, then it is up to us to make the change. Parents should start on controling or monitor the violent content for their children. A child's behaviour develope on how they are brought up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I some how have a different thought about parents controlling or monitoring the source of violence for their children. For me, the more parents control, the more rebellious the child is. They will act as a good and obidient child in front of parents but became the totally opposite person when they are not with their parents.

    ReplyDelete
  4. it is really up to how the parents control their children. if they do it wrongly, say being over protective or over-suffocating their child, then naturally the child will want to rebel. so although difficult, parents should find ways to effectively teach their children about the negative effects of violence. like i said in my post, inevitably, children are exposed to violence, so use it to emphasise more on positive values

    ReplyDelete